Just how scientific is Darwin’s theory of evolution through natural selection from a common ancestor? These articles point out the lack of scientificity of Evolution.
The philosopher Karl Popper proposed a criterion for a scientific theory is that it must not simply pass experimental tests but that it must be formulated in such a way that falsification is, in principle, possible, which has been widely accepted in the scientific community [1]. The criterion is there so that a theory can be corrected/edited to be accurate, i.e. a theory that…
Among the most vocal critics of evolution are scientists from different fields, specifically mathematics and physics. Evolution is not consistent with other scientific theories, and below are some of them: 1. Second law of thermodynamics (increasing entropy). The supposed evolutionary process breaks the most universal and best-proven law of physics, the law of increasing entropy, known as the second law of thermodynamics. The law…
In his 1838 essay on Theology and Natural Selection, Darwin insisted that any good scientific explanation had to be capable of making predictions – which is precisely what led him to reject creationism in the first place. Since the “will of God” is not subject to any law, it is unpredictable. For this reason, Darwin regarded theological explanations of biological diversity as scientifically useless.…
Evolution fails to explain several past events (retrodiction) that we have evidence of today. Below are seven of these observable phenomena showing there are problems for evolution in retrodictions. 1. How acquired beneficial mutations pass on to the descendants For a mutation to stay in a population it has to be transferred to the offspring. It is easy in single-celled organisms, but not for…
