LGBTQs and Civil Rights 

Some countries promote civil rights of LGBTQs by prohibiting rehabilitation and therapy for LGBTQs to support in their recovery path to heterosexuality. But we know that LGBTQs are statistically more prone to suffer from:  A significantly decreased likelihood of establishing or preserving a successful marriage  A five-to-ten-year decrease in life expectancy  Chronic, potentially fatal, liver disease—hepatitis  Inevitable fatal esophageal cancer  Pneumonia  Internal bleeding  HIV and other sexual transmitted diseases   Serious mental disabilities, many of which are irreversible  A much higher than usual incidence of suicide  Higher rate of sexual harassment to children due to low society adaption capabilities   Given all the statistically significant LGBTQ issues, is it really desired being an LGBTQ? Certainly not. From the detailed mental, physiological and medical studies, and the above issues, it's reasonable to conclude that being an LGBTQ is a kind of unnatural/abnormal.   Why then would keeping away the treatment and the…

Continue ReadingLGBTQs and Civil Rights 

How The Homosexuality Movement Politicized Science? 

In 1963 the New York Academy of Medicine charged its Committee on Public Health to report on the subject of homosexuality, prompted by concern that homosexual behavior seemed to be increasing. The Committee reported that:  “Homosexuality is indeed an illness. The homosexual is an emotionally disturbed individual who has not acquired the normal capacity to develop satisfying heterosexual relation.” It also noted that: “some homosexuals have gone beyond the plane of defensiveness and now argue that deviancy is a “desirable, noble, preferable way of life.”*   However, if the influential American Psychiatric Association (APA) could be convinced to redefine homosexuality, the other guilds would follow shortly thereafter and then so would the rest of society. And this was indeed the plan!   Just ten years later—with no significant new scientific evidence—the homosexual activists’ argument became the new standard within psychiatry. In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association voted to exclude homosexuality…

Continue ReadingHow The Homosexuality Movement Politicized Science? 

How Many Syrians Did David Kill?

In the account of Samuel, it says: “And the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syrians, and forty thousand horsemen, and smote Shobach, the captain of their host, who died there.” (2 Samuel 10:18)  Whereas the book of the Chronicles report says: “But the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew of the Syrians seven thousand men which fought in chariots, and forty thousand footmen, and killed Shophach the captain of the host.” (1 Chronicles 19:18)  There seems to be a "contradiction" here, for the first verse says 700 men but Chronicles says 7,000 men.  How can we explain this difference in accounts?  The explanation is simple as it just requires careful reading. The first verse says:  “… David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syrians…”  The verse does not say that David killed 700 men,…

Continue ReadingHow Many Syrians Did David Kill?

How Old Was Ahaziah When He Began To Reign?

In the account of the Book of Kings it says:  “Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother’s name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.” (2 Kings 8:26)  On the other hand, the record in the second Book of Chronicles gives a different age for Ahaziah. It says:   “Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.” (2 Chronicles 22:2)  There seems to be a "contradiction" here, as the first verse says Ahaziah was 22 years old when he began to reign. But the second verse writes 42 years old. How can this be?  The explanation is a bit more complicated because, unlike other difficulties in the Bible,, "reading carefully" doesn't…

Continue ReadingHow Old Was Ahaziah When He Began To Reign?

How Many Horses Did Solomon Have?

It says in the Book of Kings:  “And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.” (1 Kings 4:26)  Whereas in the Book of Chronicles, it says:  “And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.” (2. Chronicles 9:25)  There seems to be a "contradiction" here as the first verse says 40,000 horses but Chronicles writes 4,000 horses. So how can we explain this discrepancy?  The explanation is quite simple as it just requires careful reading. The first verse says:  “… Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots…”  The verse says that Solomon had 40,000 stalls for his horses for the chariots, so the number of horses is 40,000.  The second verse says:  “…Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and…

Continue ReadingHow Many Horses Did Solomon Have?

How Many Baths Were In The Cup? 

In the account of the Book of Kings it says:  “And it was a handbreadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths.” (1 Kings 7:26)  It's important to note that: 1 Kings Chapter 7 is a brief chapter about Solomon’s palace construction and everything inside and outside of it and this verse explains how were the cups, where priests used to wash in for uncleanliness, designed. While, on the other hand, the record in the Book of Chronicles says:  “And the thickness of it was a handbreadth, and the brim of it like the work of the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies; and it received and held three thousand baths.” (2 Chronicles 4:5)  There seems to be a "contradiction" here as the Book of Kings says that there were 2,000…

Continue ReadingHow Many Baths Were In The Cup? 

Is the New Testament (NT) reliable? (Part II: The reliability of the New Testament story) 

To judge the reliability of the biblical story, scholars apply the criteria of authenticity to the biblical accounts. The criteria of authenticity represent standards or tools by which the historical plausibility of an event is assessed. So let’s discuss 3 of these criteria and apply them to the biblical story  1. The criterion of multiple attestation: the criterion states that if an event or a story is recorded by multiple and independent sources, that boosts its likelihood to have occurred. Applying this to the biblical story, we have several non-Christian sources (Roman, Greek and Jewish) that affirm the following facts which are in congruence with the biblical story and therefore attest to the reliability of the story:              1. Jesus Christ lived in the first century AD in Judea.               2. He was believed to be a miracle worker.              3. He was followed by several disciples believing…

Continue ReadingIs the New Testament (NT) reliable? (Part II: The reliability of the New Testament story)